COPYRIGHT ©  2025 PTI QCS

In many internal audits, the spotlight usually falls on the production line: misassembled parts, ineffective inspections, miscalibrated equipment.
 
But what if we told you that a significant number of nonconformities begin long before a single part ever hits the shop floor?
 
A recent study brings an uncomfortable truth to the surface: the most expensive quality issues often originate as early as process planning, design, or even during the initial interaction with suppliers.
 
How costly can an unprevented error be?
 
Researchers at the University of Kragujevac (Serbia) monitored the operations of an automotive plant for one year and found something alarming: costs associated with nonconforming products ranged between €2,500 and €10,000 per month.
 
Surprisingly, most of these costs didn’t come from visible or “major” defects, but from small deviations that became normalized until they turned systemic.
 
The good news? Tackling the most frequent nonconformities—those with early-stage origins—can have a direct impact on operational margins. But to do that, you first need to recognize the warning signs.
 
Early warning signs of an emerging nonconformity

The symptoms are there. The challenge is not getting used to them. Some key indicators that should raise red flags include:

Follow us!

Nonconformities in Automotive Manufacturing: When the Root Cause Lies in Planning

You might be interested in these articles:

• Have You Gotten Used to Scrap? It’s Time to Break the Cycle
  

• Manage Prevention with Intelligence Applied to FMEA
  

• Practical Guide to Handling an OEM Quality Alert Without Losing Control 
  
  
  

At PTI QCS, we don’t wait for problems—we prevent them with you.
 
We help OEMs and automotive suppliers detect risks before they become failures. We specialize in identifying deviations early, reinforcing process consistency, documenting critical variations, and supporting the implementation of effective controls.
 
Our commitment is clear: help you prevent a nonconformity from becoming part of your process, and that starts with better planning.
 
Write to us at janava@ptiqcs.com if you're in Mexico, or sales@ptiqcs.com if you operate in the U.S. or Canada. 

When these patterns repeat, it’s no longer a one-off slip. It points to a fragile quality culture in the planning phase.
 
What can be done before production even begins?
 
Prevention isn’t just good practice—it’s a competitive advantage. Recommended actions include:

• Frequent changes to drawings and DFMEAs with no clear follow-up actions
  
• Pilot test results that barely pass—or require concessions
  
• Cpk values below 1.33 without a concrete improvement plan
  
• Repetitive findings in internal audits—always the same issues
  
• Engineering transfers between sites with poor traceability
  
• High turnover among key engineers and technicians
  
• Misalignment between Quality and Purchasing—cost prioritized over technical capability 
  

• Predictive process audits, not reactive ones
  
• Involving SQA in critical APQP decisions—not just the final validation
  
• Applying Design of Experiments (DOE) and variability analysis during development
  
• Visualizing early alerts using project risk dashboards
  
• Cross-training between quality, engineering, and purchasing to align technical criteria
  

What’s the payoff of a preventive strategy?
 
Prevention costs less than correction, and far less than containment. Companies that apply these strategies see results like:

• A 60–80% reduction in rework and containment after SOP 
• Decreased operational load from NCRs and 8D reports 
• Stronger customer trust from week one 
• And above all: stable production from day one